New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Long reads
20 February 2006updated 24 Sep 2015 11:31am

Muhammad and Python

Poking fun at the Prophet is pointless, writes Samir El-Youssef. The satire would be better directed

By Samir El-Youssef

Every time I watch Life of Brian, the Monty Python classic satirising Jesus Christ, I think about writing something similar about the Prophet Muhammad. The story of early Islam has a hilariously comic side that would be a gift for the Python scriptwriters. Yet I’ve never tried to write such a version. Obviously, if I did so I would be risking a fatwa. At the same time, I’m also inhibited by a deep-rooted politeness towards religion, which, despite my having embraced the theory of evolution from an early age, remains with me from childhood.

I grew up in a Sunni Muslim community in southern Lebanon in the 1970s, before the rise of political Islam and when religion had no dominant role in society. Nevertheless, for this community, a few areas were regarded as beyond the reach of humour and satire: namely Allah, the Koran, the Prophet Muhammad, and his four successors, Abu Bakr, Omar, Osman and Ali. The sacred was perceived as very remote from daily life; it seems to me that it was this separateness, rather than the fear of punishment, whether earthly or divine, that made most people avoid poking fun at Allah or the Prophet.

The sacred was beyond satire not only because it was the source of meaning in people’s lives, but also because making jokes about it was just not the way people chose to express themselves. Swearing at or joking about Allah and his Prophet, something that the impious did regularly, was considered more of a sign of bad education and vulgarity than blasphemy. One was meant to make fun of the familiar; instead of satirising the sources of religion, people poked fun at sheikhs, imams and the obviously too pious. The sheikhs’ appetite for food and sex, the parasitic tendencies of the imams, and the attempts of the pious to look and sound learned were all topics of many jokes.

Now with the spread of political Islam, some of which has fascist tendencies and aims, I think those of us on the left who care about advancing secular learning and values should be directing our criticism and satire at worldly religious powers.

Instead of drawing a vulgar cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad, thus helping fascist Islamist groups promote their dangerous agendas, why not draw Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the lunatic walking cartoon who is currently president of Iran? From now on, every time I see Life of Brian, I’ll be thinking of writing Monty Python’s Life of Abu Hamza.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

Samir el-Youssef received the 2005 Tucholsky Award for Freedom of Speech for his writings on Palestine

Content from our partners
The death - and rebirth - of public sector consultancy
How the Thames Tideway Tunnel is cleaning up London
The UK has talent in abundance. We need to nurture it